Flooding At Accotink Creek
By Jeanette Stewart
Photographs by Kris Unger
I think everyone would agree that Saturday, September 6, was a pretty wet day (over 8 inches of rain recorded). As part of LANDS and WATERS work tracking events that impact our local watersheds, I visited Accotink Creek at two locations shortly after the storm ended to assess the condition of the creek and surrounding areas.
I
found the usual meandering Daniels Run Stream anything but meandering.
Both the volume and velocity of the stream had increased but at

My next stop further down the creek was an entirely different story.
As the water made its way to


There is no doubt this was an intense storm but when I heard a citizen
remark that the storm demonstrated the power of nature, I countered that
his statement was only partially true. The intensity of the
flooding, the amount and velocity of the water in Accotink was the
result of human development in the Accotink Watershed. If the
lands around the creek had been forested, the ability of the land to
absorb the rainwater would have been much greater. Instead, much
of the rain water fell on impervious surfaces, ran off these surfaces,
was channeled into storm drains and directed into Accotink, creating an
unnatural and impossible situation for the creek. Nature has
safeguards and buffers in place for many if not most extreme weather
conditions. We in our development process are repeatedly removing
them. Katrina bore this out all too plainly. This is not the
first or last time intense storms have or will hit our area. The
challenge before us is to recognize the role we play in how these
storms play out.
The Day After the Storm revealed the damage done more clearly. Kris Unger, a local photographer, is partnering with LANDS and WATERS to document activities within the Accotink Creek Watershed. We visited the Camelot area early Sunday morning.

The condition of the railings on the trail's bridges was disappointing
but what we discovered next was much more damaging.
Large areas of forest have been removed as part of the HOT Lane
Project. Accotink had lost a large portion of its last line of
defense against stormwater runoff. It was more vulnerable than
ever. The sediment control measures taken by the construction
company to buffer the stream again erosion failed and a stream of
sediment was directed into Accotink Creek.

The repercussions of this failure are enormous. Sediment is
a major pollutant to our local streams and the
I
don't think the creek or the wildlife that depend on the creek for
habitat care whether the letter of the law was obeyed. They only
have to live with the consequences - as we all do. Our quality of
life here in